Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/bert_hubert/statuses/111665617538780328">bert hubert 🇺🇦🇪🇺 (bert_hubert@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 30-Dec-2023 06:06:56 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@bert_hubert" title="bert_hubert@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/91208-48-20230123121904.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="bert hubert 🇺🇦🇪🇺" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">bert hubert 🇺🇦🇪🇺</a></section><article><p>The EU Cyber Resilience Act latest text has some pretty good words on open source. These words are to be found in the preamble &amp; "recitals". Contrary to what some people are now claiming, these words on open source do determine what the act means &amp; how judges will read it. These are not just 'non-binding comments': <br><a href="https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/eu-cra-recitals-comments-compiler-judge/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/eu-cra-recitals-comments-compiler-judge/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2515422#notice-4979548">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-12-30T06:06:56+09:00" title="Saturday, 30-Dec-2023 06:06:56 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@bert_hubert/111665617538780328" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@bert_hubert/111665617538780328">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: berthub.eu</div><h5><a href="https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/eu-cra-recitals-comments-compiler-judge/">EU CRA: The compiler does not read the comments, but judges do read the Recitals - Bert Hubert's writings</a></h5><div> from <span>@bert_hu_bert</span></div></header><div>A bit of an “emergency blog post”. The final compromise text of the EU Cyber Resilience Act is now available, and various open source voices are now opining on it. This is a complex act and other parts of the open source world (like the Eclipse Foundation and NLNetLabs) have been hard at work to advocate with the EU and member states to get a CRA that is good for open source.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
bert hubert 🇺🇦🇪🇺 (bert_hubert@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 30-Dec-2023 06:06:56 JST bert hubert 🇺🇦🇪🇺
The EU Cyber Resilience Act latest text has some pretty good words on open source. These words are to be found in the preamble & "recitals". Contrary to what some people are now claiming, these words on open source do determine what the act means & how judges will read it. These are not just 'non-binding comments':
https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/eu-cra-recitals-comments-compiler-judge/
In conversationabout a year ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: berthub.eu
  EU CRA: The compiler does not read the comments, but judges do read the Recitals - Bert Hubert's writings
  from @bert_hu_bert
  A bit of an “emergency blog post”. The final compromise text of the EU Cyber Resilience Act is now available, and various open source voices are now opining on it. This is a complex act and other parts of the open source world (like the Eclipse Foundation and NLNetLabs) have been hard at work to advocate with the EU and member states to get a CRA that is good for open source.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice