Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this notice@p @11112011 @FreedoingVlad @Grandtheftautism @Senator_Armstrong @animeirl @dicey @eisai @icedquinn @ins0mniak
I might beg off of that dichotomy because I think Platonic forms are comprised of function.
It relates to his larger theory of causality as a proof of metaphysics, which is a bit subtle, although I riff on it in a recent article for the Evil Site.
To Plato a chair was not the result of the form of a chair, but the result of the forms of gravity and humans.
(Philosophy professors always use chairs for some reason. They are easily understood as the simplest solution to a certain need. This means that their form is almost exclusively defined by this need. Anything with support and a back is a chair, even a hollowed stump.)