@amerika @11112011 @FreedoingVlad @Grandtheftautism @Senator_Armstrong @animeirl @dicey @eisai @icedquinn @ins0mniak

> This offends the human ego, to have to accept what we do not know, but it is also the beginning of wisdom.

Well, yeah, definitely, but "know but cannot prove" is even worse. We thought math was safe and then Kurt Goedel came and fucked that up and this really frustrated people.

> Realists and consequentialists are interested in effects in reality.

If I am not mistaken, this is not too many steps removed from phenomenology, where you are more concerned with properties (a thing is what it does) than some Platonic ideal about the true essence of the thing.