Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mstdn-social.com/users/fishcharlie/statuses/111581634637242257">Charlie Fish (fishcharlie@mstdn-social.com)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 07:13:42 JST</a><a href="https://mstdn-social.com/@fishcharlie" title="fishcharlie@mstdn-social.com"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/130023-48-20230521104932.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Charlie Fish" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Charlie Fish</a><div><a href="https://mas.to/@carnage4life/111580738585451240" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mas.to/@carnage4life">@carnage4life</a> It looks like threads.net is listed here: <a href="https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists</a>. Which mas.to seems to base their blocklist off of.</p><p>Almost looks like 60-80% of consensus for blocks to appear on that list. Is threads.net already blocked that widely???</p><p>I don’t understand how so many people here advocate for the fediverse concept while also blocking servers over literally nothing. threads.net has not fedierated any spam, malicious content or anything negative yet. Way too premature…</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2458690#notice-4864355">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-12-16T07:13:42+09:00" title="Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 07:13:42 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mstdn-social.com/@fishcharlie/111581634637242257" rel="external" title="Sent from mstdn-social.com via ActivityPub">mstdn-social.com</a></span></span><a href="https://mstdn-social.com/@fishcharlie/111581634637242257">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><img height="128" width="128" src="https://gnusocial.jp/thumbnail/22307?w=128&amp;h=128"><h5><a href="https://mas.to/about">mas.to</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Hello! mas.to is a general-topic instance.We're enthusiastic about Mastodon and aim to run a fast, up-to-date and fun Mastodon instance.</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://www.threads.net/">Barcelona</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: codeberg.org</div><h5><a href="https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists">blocklists</a></h5><div> from <span>oliphant</span></div></header><div>Blocklists</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Charlie Fish (fishcharlie@mstdn-social.com)'s status on Saturday, 16-Dec-2023 07:13:42 JSTCharlie Fish
in reply to
- Dare Obasanjo
@carnage4life It looks like threads.net is listed here: https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists. Which mas.to seems to base their blocklist off of.
Almost looks like 60-80% of consensus for blocks to appear on that list. Is threads.net already blocked that widely???
I don’t understand how so many people here advocate for the fediverse concept while also blocking servers over literally nothing. threads.net has not fedierated any spam, malicious content or anything negative yet. Way too premature…
In conversationabout a year ago from mstdn-social.compermalink
Attachments
1. mas.to
  Hello! mas.to is a general-topic instance. We're enthusiastic about Mastodon and aim to run a fast, up-to-date and fun Mastodon instance.
2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Barcelona
3. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: codeberg.org
  blocklists
  from oliphant
  Blocklists

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice