Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/theconversationau/statuses/111531715807897073">The Conversation AU + NZ (theconversationau@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Dec-2023 14:29:31 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@theconversationau" title="theconversationau@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/77111-48-20230214080353.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="The Conversation AU + NZ" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">The Conversation AU + NZ</a></section><article><p>It’s the fourth most popular website in the world, but our new study shows toxic commentary can still thrive on Wikipedia. There’s a lot at stake if too many editors are driven away.<br><a href="https://theconversation.com/wikipedias-volunteer-editors-are-fleeing-online-abuse-heres-what-that-could-mean-for-the-internet-and-you-218517?utm_medium=Social&amp;utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1701836054" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://theconversation.com/wikipedias-volunteer-editors-are-fleeing-online-abuse-heres-what-that-could-mean-for-the-internet-and-you-218517?utm_medium=Social&amp;utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1701836054</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2419048#notice-4781313">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-12-06T14:29:31+09:00" title="Wednesday, 06-Dec-2023 14:29:31 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@theconversationau/111531715807897073" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@theconversationau/111531715807897073">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: images.theconversation.com</div><h5><a href="https://theconversation.com/wikipedias-volunteer-editors-are-fleeing-online-abuse-heres-what-that-could-mean-for-the-internet-and-you-218517?utm_medium=Social&amp;utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1701836054">Wikipedia's volunteer editors are fleeing online abuse. Here's what that could mean for the internet (and you)</a></h5><div> from <span>@ibsmirnov</span></div></header><div>It’s the fourth most popular website in the world, but our new study shows toxic commentary can still thrive on Wikipedia. There’s a lot at stake if too many editors are driven away.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
The Conversation AU + NZ (theconversationau@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 06-Dec-2023 14:29:31 JST The Conversation AU + NZ
It’s the fourth most popular website in the world, but our new study shows toxic commentary can still thrive on Wikipedia. There’s a lot at stake if too many editors are driven away.
https://theconversation.com/wikipedias-volunteer-editors-are-fleeing-online-abuse-heres-what-that-could-mean-for-the-internet-and-you-218517?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1701836054
In conversationabout a year ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: images.theconversation.com
  Wikipedia's volunteer editors are fleeing online abuse. Here's what that could mean for the internet (and you)
  from @ibsmirnov
  It’s the fourth most popular website in the world, but our new study shows toxic commentary can still thrive on Wikipedia. There’s a lot at stake if too many editors are driven away.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice