Your understanding of the url field is incorrect. It’s not supposed to specifically be what you think it is supposed to be, as shown by the examples from the spec, what little of that spec there is. Please stop haranguing me about this topic because I’m not going to budge on it.
At this stage, I’m more likely to move forward with the specification idea that @Moon suggested on my own fork and just never MR it here because of the extreme unreasonableness I’m getting from you here.