Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/111451939429919849">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Nov-2023 12:27:00 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a><div><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/111451929466001291" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Notably, in the Idaho AG/ADF/Cooper&amp;Kirk application for a stay pending appeal, they are providing an alternative argument that SCOTUS should take up the EMTALA question now for merits arguments this term.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2362232#notice-4663516">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-11-22T12:27:00+09:00" title="Wednesday, 22-Nov-2023 12:27:00 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/111451939429919849" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/111451939429919849">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1865706">IV. Alternatively, The Court Should Grant Certiorari Before Judgment.
For all the reasons just explained, this Court should stay the en banc Ninth
Circuit’s unreasoned order and restore the status quo: the stay pending appeal
entered by the unanimous panel below. Alternatively, the Court could construe this
application as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment, grant the petition,
and set this case for expedited briefing and argument this Term on the question of
whether EMTALA preempts state laws that protect human life and prohibit abor-
28
tions, like Idaho’s Defense of Life Act. Idaho is prepared to brief this case on a
schedule that would allow argument during the Court’s April 2024 sitting. See Biden
v. Nebraska, 143 S. Ct. 477 (2022) (deferring application to vacate injunction and
granting certiorari before judgment).</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/111/451/939/194/929/301/original/32108c77352b7612.png" rel="external">https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/111/451/939/194/929/301/original/32108c77352b7612.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Nov-2023 12:27:00 JST Chris Geidner
in reply to
Notably, in the Idaho AG/ADF/Cooper&Kirk application for a stay pending appeal, they are providing an alternative argument that SCOTUS should take up the EMTALA question now for merits arguments this term.
In conversationabout a year ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. IV. Alternatively, The Court Should Grant Certiorari Before Judgment. For all the reasons just explained, this Court should stay the en banc Ninth Circuit’s unreasoned order and restore the status quo: the stay pending appeal entered by the unanimous panel below. Alternatively, the Court could construe this application as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment, grant the petition, and set this case for expedited briefing and argument this Term on the question of whether EMTALA preempts state laws that protect human life and prohibit abor- 28 tions, like Idaho’s Defense of Life Act. Idaho is prepared to brief this case on a schedule that would allow argument during the Court’s April 2024 sitting. See Biden v. Nebraska, 143 S. Ct. 477 (2022) (deferring application to vacate injunction and granting certiorari before judgment).
  https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/111/451/939/194/929/301/original/32108c77352b7612.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice