Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/111451929466001291">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Nov-2023 12:27:00 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a><div><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/111451917158578419" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>This will be a new shadow docket matter at SCOTUS although it's not yet on the docket. ADF's link to the filing: <a href="https://adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/IdahoMotionToStayPendingAppeal.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/IdahoMotionToStayPendingAppeal.pdf</a></p><p>I've written extensively on this case at Law Dork, most recently about Ninth Circuit shenanigans: <a href="https://www.lawdork.com/p/ninth-circuit-abortion-trump-appointees" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.lawdork.com/p/ninth-circuit-abortion-trump-appointees</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2362232#notice-4663515">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-11-22T12:27:00+09:00" title="Wednesday, 22-Nov-2023 12:27:00 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/111451929466001291" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/111451929466001291">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1865703">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.lawdork.com/p/ninth-circuit-abortion-trump-appointees">Ninth Circuit abortion care case highlights Trump judicial appointees' power</a></h5><div> from <span>Chris Geidner</span></div></header><div>Even on "liberal" courts. For nearly two weeks recently, a trio of Trump appointees expanded the reach of Idaho's criminal abortion law.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Nov-2023 12:27:00 JST Chris Geidner
in reply to
This will be a new shadow docket matter at SCOTUS although it's not yet on the docket. ADF's link to the filing: https://adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/IdahoMotionToStayPendingAppeal.pdf
I've written extensively on this case at Law Dork, most recently about Ninth Circuit shenanigans: https://www.lawdork.com/p/ninth-circuit-abortion-trump-appointees
In conversationabout a year ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com
  Ninth Circuit abortion care case highlights Trump judicial appointees' power
  from Chris Geidner
  Even on "liberal" courts. For nearly two weeks recently, a trio of Trump appointees expanded the reach of Idaho's criminal abortion law.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice