Embed Notice

@admitsWrongIfProven

The murderer comparison does not fit. Victim would be the person that has the consequences.

Great, then that would be the fetus, and when someone is unable to express their will to live we assume they have one.

The risk to the murderer is not nonexistant.. they risk emotional damage fromt heir acts, harm from the victim fighting back, etc. So both have consequences. The reason we facor the victim isnt because they are the only one with consequences, it is because the murderer put them in the situation against their will, much like a moth puts their unborn child int hat situation against the childs will.