Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://peculiar.florist/notes/9lryoq72mpcnn47c">Tournesol 🌻 (tournesol@peculiar.florist)'s status on Tuesday, 07-Nov-2023 23:07:43 JST</a><a href="https://peculiar.florist/@tournesol" title="tournesol@peculiar.florist"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/161449-48-20230819140515.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Tournesol 🌻" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Tournesol 🌻</a></section><article><p>If you want to try firefish out, don't get an account at firefish.social for the moment.<br><br>It runs an instable version of the instable version of firefish :neocat_blush_hide:<br><br>RE: <a href="https://post.naskya.net/notes/9kyj9kyxngdy23mo">https://post.naskya.net/notes/9kyj9kyxngdy23mo</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2292846#notice-4522065">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-11-07T23:07:43+09:00" title="Tuesday, 07-Nov-2023 23:07:43 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://peculiar.florist/notes/9lryoq72mpcnn47c" rel="external" title="Sent from peculiar.florist via ActivityPub">peculiar.florist</a></span></span><a href="https://peculiar.florist/notes/9lryoq72mpcnn47c">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.post.naskya.net</div><h5><a href="https://post.naskya.net/notes/9kyj9kyxngdy23mo">naskya :opensource: (@dev)</a></h5><div></div></header><div>@maybeanerd@firefish.social 
&gt; I joined this instance to try out #firefish, and I'm really enjoying the UI, UX, and features
Thanks :meow_melt:
&gt; But it seems really unstable. (Requests failing left and right, UI not updating with reactions, just being slow)
&gt; I know this server ist running v1.1.0-dev6, which seems like it's not a stable release.
The typical Firefish server setup uses Redis and PostgreSQL, but you can replace Redis with DragonflyDB and PostgreSQL with ScyllaDB for better performance, and firefish.social does both since there are many users. However, the ScyllaDB support is still unmerged and very experimental (I think v1.1.x indicates the ScyllaDB branch). So firefish.social uses more unstable version than the unstable version. Hopefully it'll get better in the future, as it's updated frequently with bug fixes... :ameow_sticks:
&gt; Is the platform more stable in general?
&gt; Seeing you running another different version that also looked unstable
The version number on my server is odd because I use a slightly modified version of Firefish for personyal preference, but I believe the experience is basically the same as the normal one. I'm super happy with my server (which runs at 3.5 USD/mo(!) btw), so I think Firefish is generally more stable.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Tournesol 🌻 (tournesol@peculiar.florist)'s status on Tuesday, 07-Nov-2023 23:07:43 JST Tournesol 🌻
If you want to try firefish out, don't get an account at firefish.social for the moment.

It runs an instable version of the instable version of firefish :neocat_blush_hide:

RE: https://post.naskya.net/notes/9kyj9kyxngdy23mo
In conversationabout a year ago from peculiar.floristpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.post.naskya.net
  naskya :opensource: (@dev)
  @maybeanerd@firefish.social > I joined this instance to try out #firefish, and I'm really enjoying the UI, UX, and features Thanks :meow_melt: > But it seems really unstable. (Requests failing left and right, UI not updating with reactions, just being slow) > I know this server ist running v1.1.0-dev6, which seems like it's not a stable release. The typical Firefish server setup uses Redis and PostgreSQL, but you can replace Redis with DragonflyDB and PostgreSQL with ScyllaDB for better performance, and firefish.social does both since there are many users. However, the ScyllaDB support is still unmerged and very experimental (I think v1.1.x indicates the ScyllaDB branch). So firefish.social uses more unstable version than the unstable version. Hopefully it'll get better in the future, as it's updated frequently with bug fixes... :ameow_sticks: > Is the platform more stable in general? > Seeing you running another different version that also looked unstable The version number on my server is odd because I use a slightly modified version of Firefish for personyal preference, but I believe the experience is basically the same as the normal one. I'm super happy with my server (which runs at 3.5 USD/mo(!) btw), so I think Firefish is generally more stable.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice