clackeTried the RAADS-R autism self-eval. Interesting! The interpretation is confusing:
50 Some autistic traits, but likely not autistic (yet some autistic people score as low as 44).
65 The minimum score at which autism is considered.
90 Stronger indications of autism, although non-autistics may score as high.
130 The mean score of autistic people; strong evidence for autism.
160 Very strong evidence for autism.
227 The maximum score autistic people acquired in Ritvo’s seminal paper on the RAADS–R.
[9]240 The maximum possible RAADS–R score
Is "not autistic" 25 and below? I guess, because if it's 25–50, what is below then? I guess "some traits" is 50–65? But what is 25–50 then? Are they supposed to be overlapping so that 0–50 is "not" and 25–65 is "some traits"?
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the