Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/brettcannon/statuses/111270169332598337">Brett Cannon (brettcannon@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 21-Oct-2023 10:42:39 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@brettcannon" title="brettcannon@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/62876-48-20240906105420.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Brett Cannon" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Brett Cannon</a></section><article><p>I just announced my conditional acceptance of <a href="https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/</a> over at <a href="https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-723-decision/36763" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-723-decision/36763</a> . Hopefully this will make writing single-file scripts a much easier proposition for people when they want to reach for something not contained in the stdlib.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2213019#notice-4352560">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-10-21T10:42:39+09:00" title="Saturday, 21-Oct-2023 10:42:39 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@brettcannon/111270169332598337" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@brettcannon/111270169332598337">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/">PEP 723 – Embedding pyproject.toml in single-file scripts | peps.python.org</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs)</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: global.discourse-cdn.com</div><h5><a href="https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-723-decision/36763">PEP 722/723 decision</a></h5><div></div></header><div>So this was not an easy decision to make between PEP 722 and PEP 723, making it hard to be the PEP delegate (and that’s ignoring all of the controversy surrounding me being the delegate to begin with). I think pretty much everyone acknowledged that either solution would be great to have, but neither PEP explicitly stood out as objectively better than the other (I saw plenty of comments along the lines of, “I would accept either,” after expressing a preference). So this took a lot of thought, ref...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Brett Cannon (brettcannon@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 21-Oct-2023 10:42:39 JST Brett Cannon
I just announced my conditional acceptance of https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/ over at https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-723-decision/36763 . Hopefully this will make writing single-file scripts a much easier proposition for people when they want to reach for something not contained in the stdlib.
In conversationabout a year ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  PEP 723 – Embedding pyproject.toml in single-file scripts | peps.python.org
  Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs)
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: global.discourse-cdn.com
  PEP 722/723 decision
  So this was not an easy decision to make between PEP 722 and PEP 723, making it hard to be the PEP delegate (and that’s ignoring all of the controversy surrounding me being the delegate to begin with). I think pretty much everyone acknowledged that either solution would be great to have, but neither PEP explicitly stood out as objectively better than the other (I saw plenty of comments along the lines of, “I would accept either,” after expressing a preference). So this took a lot of thought, ref...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice