Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/Sheril/statuses/111241077577022241">Sheril Kirshenbaum (sheril@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 16-Oct-2023 08:40:41 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Sheril" title="sheril@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/15426-48-20221101033912.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Sheril Kirshenbaum" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Sheril Kirshenbaum</a></section><article><p>“Vote NO on Woman Suffrage” 🙄</p><p>Not ancient <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/history" rel="tag">#history</a>, but just a century ago.</p><p>Source: State Archives of North Carolina</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2190761#notice-4304057">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-10-16T08:40:41+09:00" title="Monday, 16-Oct-2023 08:40:41 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Sheril/111241077577022241" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Sheril/111241077577022241">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1659152">BECAUSE 90% of the women either do not want it, or do not care. BECAUSE it means competition of women with men instead of co-operation. BECAUSE 90% of the women eligible are married, and can only double on their husband’s votes. Because it can be of no benefit commensurate with the additional expense involved. Because in some states, more voting women than voting men will place the government under petticoat rule. Because it is unwise to risk the good we already have for the Evil which may occur.votes of women can accomplish no more than votes of men. Why waste time, energy, and money, without result?National Association opposed to Woman Suffrage, New York and Washington DC, post-1911. Equal Suffrage Amendment Coalition, Private Collections, State Archives of North Carolina</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/241/041/308/133/891/original/ff5de7831d07d45e.jpeg" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/241/041/308/133/891/original/ff5de7831d07d45e.jpeg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Sheril Kirshenbaum (sheril@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 16-Oct-2023 08:40:41 JST Sheril Kirshenbaum
“Vote NO on Woman Suffrage” 🙄
Not ancient #history, but just a century ago.
Source: State Archives of North Carolina
In conversationabout a year ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. BECAUSE 90% of the women either do not want it, or do not care. BECAUSE it means competition of women with men instead of co-operation. BECAUSE 90% of the women eligible are married, and can only double on their husband’s votes. Because it can be of no benefit commensurate with the additional expense involved. Because in some states, more voting women than voting men will place the government under petticoat rule. Because it is unwise to risk the good we already have for the Evil which may occur.votes of women can accomplish no more than votes of men. Why waste time, energy, and money, without result? National Association opposed to Woman Suffrage, New York and Washington DC, post-1911. Equal Suffrage Amendment Coalition, Private Collections, State Archives of North Carolina
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/241/041/308/133/891/original/ff5de7831d07d45e.jpeg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice