Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/fediversereport/statuses/111200300930131256">Fediverse Report (fediversereport@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Oct-2023 01:18:58 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport" title="fediversereport@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/91223-48-20230125085928.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Fediverse Report" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Fediverse Report</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport/111200293981836308" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/121991" title="snarfed.org@fed.brid.gy">Ryan Barrett</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://law-and-politics.online/@Teri_Kanefield">@Teri_Kanefield</a> <a href="https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://snarfed.org/">@snarfed.org</a> </p><p>His latest update (<a href="https://snarfed.org/2023-10-06_bridgy-fed-status-update-7" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://snarfed.org/2023-10-06_bridgy-fed-status-update-7</a>) shows already how far along this is, and that is without the Bluesky protocol being 'finished', it does not even federate yet. As soon as Bluesky is finished and is really a decentralised protocol, I'd expect that there is a functional connection between both Mastodon and Bluesky. That won't really happen as long as Bluesky is still invite-only, but pretty soon after I'd guess.</p><p>2/3</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2156424#notice-4235247">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-10-09T01:18:58+09:00" title="Monday, 09-Oct-2023 01:18:58 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport/111200300930131256" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport/111200300930131256">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: snarfed.org</div><h5><a href="https://snarfed.org/2023-10-06_bridgy-fed-status-update-7">Bridgy Fed status update</a></h5><div> from <span>Ryan Barrett</span></div></header><div>Another big milestone this episode! I now have fediverse profiles fully bridged into the Bluesky federation sandbox. That means profiles can now be bridged both directions, in and out of Bluesky. T…</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Fediverse Report (fediversereport@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Oct-2023 01:18:58 JSTFediverse Report
in reply to
- I moved to Mastodon.social
- Ryan Barrett
@Teri_Kanefield @snarfed.org
His latest update (https://snarfed.org/2023-10-06_bridgy-fed-status-update-7) shows already how far along this is, and that is without the Bluesky protocol being 'finished', it does not even federate yet. As soon as Bluesky is finished and is really a decentralised protocol, I'd expect that there is a functional connection between both Mastodon and Bluesky. That won't really happen as long as Bluesky is still invite-only, but pretty soon after I'd guess.
2/3
In conversationabout a year ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: snarfed.org
  Bridgy Fed status update
  from Ryan Barrett
  Another big milestone this episode! I now have fediverse profiles fully bridged into the Bluesky federation sandbox. That means profiles can now be bridged both directions, in and out of Bluesky. T…

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice