it's also a feature of pre-corporate-takeover capitalist governments as well, if you think about it. they're just a little more hands off in terms of allowing exploitation, but the power to regulate is there just the same. it allows private profit-seeking, as opposed to wages and bonuses, as an economic overhead/motivator. and that fits what I'm suggesting too, so it's no use for you to paint one specific strawman. but we know this (regulated capitalism) has been tried and is crumbling now, along with unregulated capitalism, for the same reason that a toxic presence doesn't enable the full development of others around it. if you said the US isn't sabotaging Cuba, you wouldn't be honest, come on. if you said megacorporations that are turning most countries into plutocracies and about to make the planet inhabitable for us are willing to make room for other systems that would distribute wealth more fairly, you'd be lying outrageously. of course they wouldn't allow that, it would be against their nature.

and yet, capitalism is crumbling, being replaced by technofeudalism, with all the enshittification that this brings with it. it had a strong run, it took the rentists a couple of centuries to reorganize, but here they are. if we survive, we may have another shot, as the exploited "enterpreneurs" and their delivery bikes may choose to unite with other exploited workers instead of going their own way.
it's a bit like the asteroid that gave mammals a chance to grow