Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/fediversereport/statuses/111138702875580822">Fediverse Report (fediversereport@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 04:13:45 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport" title="fediversereport@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/91223-48-20230125085928.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Fediverse Report" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Fediverse Report</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport/111138700134026603" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>On agency: "So, in a way, I actually think people will feel better about using our products if they know that they have the choice to leave."</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2110575#notice-4144479">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-09-28T04:13:45+09:00" title="Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 04:13:45 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport/111138702875580822" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@fediversereport/111138702875580822">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1577006">Yeah, yeah. So, in a way, that actually makes people feel more confident investing in a system if they know that they have freedom over how they operate. Maybe for phase one of social networking, it was fine to have these systems that people felt a little more locked into, but I think for the mature state of the ecosystem, I don’t think that that’s going to be where it goes.I’m pretty optimistic about this. And then if we can build Threads on this, then maybe over time, as the standards get more built out, it’s possible that we can spread that to more of the stuff that we’re doing. We’re certainly working on interop with messaging, and I think that’s been an important thing. The first step was kind of getting interop to work between our different messaging systems.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/138/702/763/357/769/original/22fc6c7904b5d2cc.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/138/702/763/357/769/original/22fc6c7904b5d2cc.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Fediverse Report (fediversereport@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 28-Sep-2023 04:13:45 JST Fediverse Report
in reply to
On agency: "So, in a way, I actually think people will feel better about using our products if they know that they have the choice to leave."
In conversationabout a year ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Yeah, yeah. So, in a way, that actually makes people feel more confident investing in a system if they know that they have freedom over how they operate. Maybe for phase one of social networking, it was fine to have these systems that people felt a little more locked into, but I think for the mature state of the ecosystem, I don’t think that that’s going to be where it goes. I’m pretty optimistic about this. And then if we can build Threads on this, then maybe over time, as the standards get more built out, it’s possible that we can spread that to more of the stuff that we’re doing. We’re certainly working on interop with messaging, and I think that’s been an important thing. The first step was kind of getting interop to work between our different messaging systems.
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/138/702/763/357/769/original/22fc6c7904b5d2cc.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice