@juliank It's unfair to request (where did the forcing part come from) that the compiler team provides an image free of malware just as what occurred before (should be all automated already, so no changes should really be required, rather the recent decision would be the thing forcing the compiler team to make changes)?
Why would they need to test the other installer, when the only difference is a few directories full of files and a repo config?

I would say leading people astray with proprietary malware is the real unfairness that's occurring here.