Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://med-mastodon.com/users/hannu_ikonen/statuses/111054592560814651">Hannu Ikonen, MD (hannu_ikonen@med-mastodon.com)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2023 10:37:53 JST</a><a href="https://med-mastodon.com/@hannu_ikonen" title="hannu_ikonen@med-mastodon.com"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/86310-48-20240323040026.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Hannu Ikonen, MD" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Hannu Ikonen, MD</a><div><a href="https://med-mastodon.com/@hannu_ikonen/111054549914100612" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Doing a blocklist with uncorroborated data &amp; any one person contributing who goes rogue and lumps personal dislike with hate is a folly.</p><p>Pooling biased subjective takes doesnt necessarily result an intersubjective pool of data from which materially more accurate or better results flow. </p><p>If the substituent ingredients for something includes dogshit, you still get dogshit results. </p><p>See: Cochrane's Mask study. <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2053386#notice-4029959">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-09-13T10:37:53+09:00" title="Wednesday, 13-Sep-2023 10:37:53 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://med-mastodon.com/@hannu_ikonen/111054592560814651" rel="external" title="Sent from med-mastodon.com via ActivityPub">med-mastodon.com</a></span></span><a href="https://med-mastodon.com/@hannu_ikonen/111054592560814651">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk</div><h5><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work">Don’t believe those who claim science proves masks don’t work | Lucky Tran</a></h5><div> from <span>https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lucky-tran</span></div></header><div>A new scientific review of the efficacy of masks is deeply flawed. That hasn’t stopped some from touting it</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Hannu Ikonen, MD (hannu_ikonen@med-mastodon.com)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2023 10:37:53 JST Hannu Ikonen, MD
in reply to
Doing a blocklist with uncorroborated data & any one person contributing who goes rogue and lumps personal dislike with hate is a folly.
Pooling biased subjective takes doesnt necessarily result an intersubjective pool of data from which materially more accurate or better results flow.
If the substituent ingredients for something includes dogshit, you still get dogshit results.
See: Cochrane's Mask study. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work
In conversationabout a year ago from med-mastodon.compermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk
  Don’t believe those who claim science proves masks don’t work | Lucky Tran
  from https://www.theguardian.com/profile/lucky-tran
  A new scientific review of the efficacy of masks is deeply flawed. That hasn’t stopped some from touting it

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice