@Inginsub No, but the same is true for the 3-clause BSD - as there's no clause that allows you to re-license to any other license.

Why is the 3-clause BSD acceptable even thought it doesn't allow re-licensing, but the GPLv3 is unacceptable when it's the exact same in not allowing re-licensing?


Could it be that your aim is to make a proprietary version of gcc by refusing to provide the source code, which the 3-clause BSD allows, but the GPLv3 does not?

Such degenerate behavior needs to be eliminated.