@opphunter88 In this case it's a very pointed Biblical illiteracy. They'll see the text and then come up with an elaborate explanation as to why it doesn't count. They'll get insulting and call you retarded. In my case they insisted that I was either black or a hapa.

To me, it's one thing to disagree about what ought to be considered canon or if a text is true or not. People debate those points all the time. But the reality is these documents say certain things and don't say other things, and when someone gets into this eisegesis you just know they're full of shit. It's really not the same as me citing to you something from Mormon scripture; you can read it, and you can see that it says what I say that it says, and then you can go, "but I don't think it's true." It's totally different to deny to everybody's face that something says what it says.