the Blackpaper (read: not a whitepaper) seeks to create lucid delirium, not to definitively answer a list of questions. literally no one, not even Nyx, agrees with the Blackpaper in the sense that one agrees with a catechism. it is clear from the title of the Blackpaper onward that G/ACC encourages multiplicity within itself on a level that most manifesto-type documents cannot. and yet for years ive seen G/ACC constantly treated as if it were a monolithic consensus (of whom lol) to negate, both by people unreasonably hostile toward it and by people adjacent to it. why? you have ample creative freedom to remix G/ACC in so many ways, so why is opposition to it almost always the go-to option?