@alex >You underestimate the power of AI.
I'm well aware of the ability of advanced chatbots to make people to think that they have intelligence and know the current limits to such "power".

>ChadGPT can use context clues to name functions based on what they do
Maybe, but there's no guarantee that the function name matches the original and I can do that too, probably with more accurate names even.

>It's clear you haven't actually tried.
Yes, I haven't run such proprietary software, that should be clear by now.

@roboneko >or careful reasoning
You need something that's not a chatbot to do reasoning that's not based on pure chance.

>maybe we could get AI to do the incredibly time consuming tasks of making sense of the machine code and then reimplementing the equivalent functionality in the form of easily readable code in a high level language
Maybe, but we would need something with intelligence and therefore something more than a chatbot that outputs convincing output based on interesting combinations of inputs.