@lxo I don't care about what you like, just block me. The arguments were made, there is nothing else to say. Privacy is a necessary aspect of freedom and without it, you don't have freedom. And if you have to fork software to make it not violate your privacy, then you are forking it to make it free, because it was not. And the harder something is to fork, the less free it is, and corporate software is made specifically for that, regardless of the license that it's under. A shitty FSF article has nothing to do with any of that. The FSF did not invent freedom, they do not decide what it is.

Again, I'm repeating myself. I should not have to make these arguments, it's basic fucking logic and people shouldn't need this to be explained to them in the first place because they should be capable of cognition. It's not even coming from me, other people had the same realizations, independently. God, I hate debates so much. Well, debates are interacting with people, and I hate people, so it shouldn't be surprising. Why am I even here? Actually, now that I think about it, I shouldn't be. That was a mistake, wasn't it?