@tirifto @gnusocialjp @digdeeper @ryo You can't have freedom without privacy. When you have privacy, you have freedom in private, by default, or it's not private. When you can't have privacy, you are not free to have privacy so you're not free. Actually, why do I even bother? Why even explain this? If you are at all capable of cognition, just listening to Richard Stallman speak one time should be enough. Not that even he is the arbiter of what the word free means, he's just the one that chose to call his thing free software.

Anyway, since people can't agree on the most basic of logic like "words mean what they mean" and have to poison everything with ideological bullshit nonsense, the term free software is now cancerous and ruined forever and can't be saved. I may abandon it entirely and just say "software that respects your freedom", which is long as fuck but should shut up the retards... probably not.

Coming up with another label should not be necessary when the English language already has the words for that, but again, stupid people have killed the language to the point that words have no meaning, so it's now unusable. Maybe it should just be fuck you software, maybe that's better. God, I hate people so much. I shouldn't even post this, I should just delete it and go back to pretending that other people don't exist.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!