> TWITTER FAILS TO ACT ON 99% OF TWITTER BLUE ACCOUNTS TWEETING HATE

ok how did they do that, they don't have API access to run this kind of analysis anymore

> Researchers collected tweets promoting hate from 100 Twitter Blue subscribers. The tweets were reported to the platform using Twitter’s own tools for flagging hateful conduct.

> Four days after reporting the tweets, researchers found that Twitter had failed to act on 99% of the posts and 100% of the accounts remained active. In the one instance that Twitter removed a hateful tweet, the account from which it was tweeted remains active.

So they searched for naughty things posted by 100 twitter blue accounts and then reported those posts and waited 4 days? That's the grand experiment? This is somehow "TWITTER FAILS TO ACT ON 99%..." ??

Is this how statistics works now?