Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/users/gnemmi/statuses/110745348438537924">Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd: (gnemmi@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Sunday, 23-Jul-2023 20:13:26 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@gnemmi" title="gnemmi@mastodon.sdf.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/28977-48-20230721092309.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd:" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd:</a></section><article><p>CJEU-C-251/21 Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt <br>Just a snippet</p><p>"Furthermore, the CJEU held that where the user of an online social network visits websites or apps to which one or more of the categories set out in Article 9(1) GDPR relate, the user does not 'manifestly make public', within the meaning of Article 9(2)(e) GDPR, the data relating to those visits collected by the operator of that online social network via cookies or similar storage technologies."</p><p><a href="https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-252/21_-_Meta_Platforms_and_Others_v_Bundeskartellamt" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-252/21_-_Meta_Platforms_and_Others_v_Bundeskartellamt</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1835332#notice-3599612">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-07-23T20:13:26+09:00" title="Sunday, 23-Jul-2023 20:13:26 JST">Sunday, 23-Jul-2023 20:13:26 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@gnemmi/110745348438537924" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.sdf.org via ActivityPub">mastodon.sdf.org</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@gnemmi/110745348438537924">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: gdprhub.eu</div><h5><a href="https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-252/21_-_Meta_Platforms_and_Others_v_Bundeskartellamt">CJEU - C-252/21 - Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt</a></h5><div></div></header><div>The CJEU decided in the case concerning Meta that competition authorities can rule on the compliance or non-compliance of the undertaking with the GDPR in the context of a decision on an abuse of a dominant position. CJEU ruled on all six legal basis to process data, further clarifying the interpretation of Article 6(1) GDPR.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd: (gnemmi@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Sunday, 23-Jul-2023 20:13:26 JST Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd:
CJEU-C-251/21 Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt
Just a snippet
"Furthermore, the CJEU held that where the user of an online social network visits websites or apps to which one or more of the categories set out in Article 9(1) GDPR relate, the user does not 'manifestly make public', within the meaning of Article 9(2)(e) GDPR, the data relating to those visits collected by the operator of that online social network via cookies or similar storage technologies."
https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-252/21_-_Meta_Platforms_and_Others_v_Bundeskartellamt
In conversationSunday, 23-Jul-2023 20:13:26 JST from mastodon.sdf.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: gdprhub.eu
  CJEU - C-252/21 - Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt
  The CJEU decided in the case concerning Meta that competition authorities can rule on the compliance or non-compliance of the undertaking with the GDPR in the context of a decision on an abuse of a dominant position. CJEU ruled on all six legal basis to process data, further clarifying the interpretation of Article 6(1) GDPR.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice