Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://progressives.social/users/chargrille/statuses/110743786733359342">Erin Conroy (chargrille@progressives.social)'s status on Thursday, 20-Jul-2023 13:28:02 JST</a><a href="https://progressives.social/@chargrille" title="chargrille@progressives.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="Erin Conroy" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Erin Conroy</a><div><a href="https://progressives.social/@chargrille/110743750153768757" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Anyway, what does all of this have to do with <a href="https://progressives.social/tags/Bluesky" rel="tag">#Bluesky</a>, you may be asking me. Or maybe not.</p><p>Longtermists would love a DirectTV channel to the hoi polloi that does not have to go through annoying "fact-checking" by "over-educated" journalists, who may have annoying habits of asking tech billionaires fancy liberal-arts-type questions like "are you using your power to make other people suffer, right now?" [Joking, this is just basic human morality, if you're not an abuser]</p><p>Back to that Jack quote</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1820105#notice-3570287">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-07-20T13:28:02+09:00" title="Thursday, 20-Jul-2023 13:28:02 JST">Thursday, 20-Jul-2023 13:28:02 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://progressives.social/@chargrille/110743786733359342" rel="external" title="Sent from progressives.social via ActivityPub">progressives.social</a></span></span><a href="https://progressives.social/@chargrille/110743786733359342">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1284625">I'm a strong believer that any content produced by someone for the internet should be permanent until the original author chooses to delete it. It should be always available and addressable. Content takedowns and suspensions should not be possible. Doing so complicates important context, learning, and enforcement of illegal activity. There are significant issues with this stance of course, but starting with this principle will allow for far better solutions than we have today. The internet is trending towards a world were storage is “free” and infinite, which places all the actual value on how to discover and see content.Which brings me to the last principle: moderation. I don’t believe a centralized system can do content moderation globally. It can only be done through ranking and relevance algorithms, the more localized the better. But instead of a company or government building and controlling these solely, people should be able to build and choose from algorithms that best match their criteria, or not have to use any at all. A “follow” action should always deliver every bit of content from the corresponding account, and the algorithms should be able to comb through everything else through arelevance lens that an individual determines. There’s a default “G- rated” algorithm, and then there’s everything else one can imagine.</a></label><br><a href="https://sb-progressives.b-cdn.net/media_attachments/files/110/743/796/117/337/333/original/8f533450eb3f5091.png" rel="external">https://sb-progressives.b-cdn.net/media_attachments/files/110/743/796/117/337/333/original/8f533450eb3f5091.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Erin Conroy (chargrille@progressives.social)'s status on Thursday, 20-Jul-2023 13:28:02 JST Erin Conroy
in reply to
Anyway, what does all of this have to do with #Bluesky, you may be asking me. Or maybe not.
Longtermists would love a DirectTV channel to the hoi polloi that does not have to go through annoying "fact-checking" by "over-educated" journalists, who may have annoying habits of asking tech billionaires fancy liberal-arts-type questions like "are you using your power to make other people suffer, right now?" [Joking, this is just basic human morality, if you're not an abuser]
Back to that Jack quote
In conversationThursday, 20-Jul-2023 13:28:02 JST from progressives.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. I'm a strong believer that any content produced by someone for the internet should be permanent until the original author chooses to delete it. It should be always available and addressable. Content takedowns and suspensions should not be possible. Doing so complicates important context, learning, and enforcement of illegal activity. There are significant issues with this stance of course, but starting with this principle will allow for far better solutions than we have today. The internet is trending towards a world were storage is “free” and infinite, which places all the actual value on how to discover and see content. Which brings me to the last principle: moderation. I don’t believe a centralized system can do content moderation globally. It can only be done through ranking and relevance algorithms, the more localized the better. But instead of a company or government building and controlling these solely, people should be able to build and choose from algorithms that best match their criteria, or not have to use any at all. A “follow” action should always deliver every bit of content from the corresponding account, and the algorithms should be able to comb through everything else through arelevance lens that an individual determines. There’s a default “G- rated” algorithm, and then there’s everything else one can imagine.
  https://sb-progressives.b-cdn.net/media_attachments/files/110/743/796/117/337/333/original/8f533450eb3f5091.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice