Embed Notice

He also argues (wrongly) that the case presents "unprecedented legal issues" and mentions the Presidential Records Act, which has nothing to do with his criminal indictment, but his argument is that his handling of the documents is covered by the PRA and not a criminal statute.

So he says these are issues of "first impression" (which means the issue has never been addressed by a court: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_impression#:~:text=First%20impression%20is%20a%20new,binding%20authority%20on%20that%20matter.)

WRONG!

This is routine case and the law is settled.

4/