First, an overview:
These arguments are not as weak as the ones he presented in the Special Master case, where he referred to the documents as "his" and challenged whether the documents were classified.
But, as with the Special Master case, he argues that there are SOOOOO many documents he needs LOTS of time to look at the documents (well then, maybe he shouldn't have stolen so many. Right?)
He opens by referring to himself as "President Donald J. Trump."
(He always leaves out 'former')
2/