@Migueldeicaza @aruiz I assume that RedHat are still providing exact SRPMs via basically the same mechanism that they provide their customers the RPMs (i.e. the ones receiving the binaries).
At least as far as the GPL is concerned, is there something I'm missing that means they're not complying with that licence (i.e. v2: 3a, v3: 6d)?
Given that AFAIK, the rule in RH is that changes must be upstream first, how are they not actually going above and beyond what's actually required?