@cajunaesthetic @MelGibsonafter4Beers i don't think it will be a real event. some historian will find something or someone to blame as some spark. sparks that start massive conflicts are in themselves not important. more it is the demoralization aspect that historians want to propagate in that any event can become a spark that creates a massive extensive conflict. it is this nihilism that convinces me that WW1 never happened as an organic conflict, but rather as a convenient meatgrinder for European men for zog. Do we name every chainsaw that cuts down a tree? do we name every logsplitter? do we name every woodchipper? What was the spark that caused a forest to be felled? historians are complicit as employees of the occupation in forming this artificial cohesive picture that massive extensive conflicts are organic. its a complete fabrication. standard history is just good enough to form a baseline explanation for hylics (npc). anyone with Racial Willpower sees right through this weak attempt of a baseline. all this shit is made up. remember historians, academics, scholars, anthropologists and archaeologists, just like journalists, aren't people. :trollface: