@sallyNULL I'm sorry, making the usage of it inconvenient for "FAGMAN" is not a good reason to use such a terrible license and it's also incompatible with the GPLv{1,2,3}.

I have the suspicion that many companies are using a bunch of software under pushover licenses in their proprietary software without even complying with the basic terms - mostly because those who select cuck licenses are too spineless to enforce their licenses and I don't think BSD 4-clause makes any difference to them.

As a result, companies aren't going to hesitate to use such software in their proprietary malware while ignoring the license terms, since the worst thing that can happen is that they'll have to add some text to the licensing section and a sentence to any advertising.



If you really want to bother them, you should license AGPLv3-or-later instead.