@osma @emilymbender @jeffjarvis @kotaro
Argh, "operator" is ambiguous to me: it could refer to the person *providing* the "AI" or to the person *using* it.
But having the "AI" use "I" to refer to its user would make little sense, so I guess you mean "I" to refer to the "AI" provider.
If so: I suspect that would not be acceptable, even and especially to the "AI" provider. I don't see any of them wanting to be *represented* by the "AI" they provide. They all want it to have a distinct identity.