On April 25, PL files a response. It's amazing.
First, he says, he's attached the copies of the cases that he previously cited. (We'll come back to that.)
Second, that he couldn't find one of the cases that was cited by the court in one of those opinions.
Third, that the opinions are excerpts - that the attachments "may not be inclusive of the entire opinions but only what is made available by online database."
It's notarized by Stephen Schwartz.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/29/mata-v-avianca-inc/