Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://dair-community.social/users/kendraserra/statuses/110441255745905455">Kendra Albert (kendraserra@dair-community.social)'s status on Sunday, 28-May-2023 02:13:33 JST</a><a href="https://dair-community.social/@kendraserra" title="kendraserra@dair-community.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/98823-48-20230215200807.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Kendra Albert" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Kendra Albert</a><div><a href="https://dair-community.social/@kendraserra/110441247466499249" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>The defendants file their response. In it, there's a footnote where they flag that they can't find the cases that PL cited to, or they don't say what PL said they said. <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/24/mata-v-avianca-inc/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/24/mata-v-avianca-inc/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1593924#notice-3143241">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-05-28T02:13:33+09:00" title="Sunday, 28-May-2023 02:13:33 JST">Sunday, 28-May-2023 02:13:33 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/3143241" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/3143241">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/1081421">1 Plaintiffs cites the following cases in support of these arguments: (1) “Shaboon v. Egyptair, 2013 IL App (1st) 111279-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2013)”; (2) “Peterson v. Iran Air, 905 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D.D.C. 2012)”; (3) “Martinez v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 2019 WL 4639462 (Tex. App. Sept. 25, 2019)”; and (4) “Estate of Durden v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 2017 WL 2418825 (Ga. Ct. App. June 5, 2017)”. The undersigned could not find these cases. Plaintiff also cites to “Ehrlich v. American Airlines, Inc., 360 N.J. Super. 360 (App. Div. 2003).” The undersigned could not locate this case, but notes that there is a Second Circuit case captioned Ehrlich v. American Airlines, Inc. regarding the ability of a passenger to recover psychological damages following an incident in international transportation. 360 F.3d 366 (2d Cir. 2004).</a></label><br><a href="https://cdn.masto.host/daircommunitysocial/media_attachments/files/110/441/253/871/197/952/original/500393e2c9f542a5.png" rel="external">https://cdn.masto.host/daircommunitysocial/media_attachments/files/110/441/253/871/197/952/original/500393e2c9f542a5.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: storage.courtlistener.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/24/mata-v-avianca-inc/">Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion – #24 in Mata v. Avianca, Inc. (S.D.N.Y., 1:22-cv-01461) – CourtListener.com</a></h5><div> from <span>@freelawproject</span></div></header><div>REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 16 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). . Document filed by Avianca, Inc...(Banino, Bartholomew) (Entered: 03/15/2023)</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Kendra Albert (kendraserra@dair-community.social)'s status on Sunday, 28-May-2023 02:13:33 JST Kendra Albert
in reply to
The defendants file their response. In it, there's a footnote where they flag that they can't find the cases that PL cited to, or they don't say what PL said they said. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/24/mata-v-avianca-inc/
In conversationSunday, 28-May-2023 02:13:33 JST from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. 1 Plaintiffs cites the following cases in support of these arguments: (1) “Shaboon v. Egyptair, 2013 IL App (1st) 111279-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2013)”; (2) “Peterson v. Iran Air, 905 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D.D.C. 2012)”; (3) “Martinez v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 2019 WL 4639462 (Tex. App. Sept. 25, 2019)”; and (4) “Estate of Durden v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 2017 WL 2418825 (Ga. Ct. App. June 5, 2017)”. The undersigned could not find these cases. Plaintiff also cites to “Ehrlich v. American Airlines, Inc., 360 N.J. Super. 360 (App. Div. 2003).” The undersigned could not locate this case, but notes that there is a Second Circuit case captioned Ehrlich v. American Airlines, Inc. regarding the ability of a passenger to recover psychological damages following an incident in international transportation. 360 F.3d 366 (2d Cir. 2004).
  https://cdn.masto.host/daircommunitysocial/media_attachments/files/110/441/253/871/197/952/original/500393e2c9f542a5.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: storage.courtlistener.com
  Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion – #24 in Mata v. Avianca, Inc. (S.D.N.Y., 1:22-cv-01461) – CourtListener.com
  from @freelawproject
  REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 16 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). . Document filed by Avianca, Inc...(Banino, Bartholomew) (Entered: 03/15/2023)

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice