Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/froomkin/statuses/110161135132970696">Dan Froomkin/presswatchers.org (froomkin@journa.host)'s status on Saturday, 08-Apr-2023 13:06:37 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@froomkin" title="froomkin@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/91581-48-20230124224734.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Dan Froomkin/presswatchers.org" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Dan Froomkin/presswatchers.org</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>RT <a href="https://journa.host/@jswatz">@jswatz</a><br>Look, I'm no expert. I just have a law degree and spent 5 years covering the FDA and its regulatory authority. But I don't see any way that there's a shred of valid legal reasoning to revoke approval of a drug the agency found safe and effective in 2000. <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/07/texas-abortion-pill-ruling-mifepristone/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/07/texas-abortion-pill-ruling-mifepristone/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1377141#notice-2836114">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-04-08T13:06:37+09:00" title="Saturday, 08-Apr-2023 13:06:37 JST">Saturday, 08-Apr-2023 13:06:37 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@froomkin/110161135132970696" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@froomkin/110161135132970696">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/854236">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Dan Froomkin/presswatchers.org (froomkin@journa.host)'s status on Saturday, 08-Apr-2023 13:06:37 JSTDan Froomkin/presswatchers.org
- John Schwartz
RT @jswatz
Look, I'm no expert. I just have a law degree and spent 5 years covering the FDA and its regulatory authority. But I don't see any way that there's a shred of valid legal reasoning to revoke approval of a drug the agency found safe and effective in 2000. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/07/texas-abortion-pill-ruling-mifepristone/
In conversationSaturday, 08-Apr-2023 13:06:37 JST from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice