Embed Notice

@paul_ipv6 The only reason I would want NAT66 is address privacy. If Ididn't need each host to have a fixed IPv6 address for use inside the network, then RFC4941 would be sufficient. NAT66 looks like it would be an easier solution to get both external address privacy and internal fixed addresses, compared to having the hosts have to do both SLAAC and DHCPv6.
If I get anything working I'll post about it. It's not a high priority at the moment.