Embed Notice

@rats @meso also, our stance is basically outlined in rules 1 through 4 of our rules. Actually what’s funny is that may well be the so-called double-speak the user demanding we be blocked was referring to, since we define rules, then define the boundaries of those rules by virtue of defining (for example) what is and is not free speech (as in rule 1).
From our rules:

1. Free speech is a fundamental human right. Hate speech is not free spech. Hate speech is unacceptable.