@p @amerika
> This is one of the issues; you can make it "want" something in the sense that you can define a goal, but machines are built: they don't decide what they want.
Very yes. Stop right there. No reason to digest it further. This precisely the point.

> That is, he thought that the question of whether a machine was "intelligent" or "conscious" was a ridiculous question and that this was an advancement in tools, so it was more useful to figure out how to enhance human capability than to try to turn a computer into a human.
Yes. Y'ES! That's the way. I think I gonna check that guy out. This sounds more useful than a video essay by some luddite whining about a curry brained slop filter that ruins the art direction of every vidya it is applied to.