Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://federate.social/users/mattblaze/statuses/117209457750923147">Matt Blaze (mattblaze@federate.social)'s status on Friday, 04-Sep-2026 07:29:11 JST</a><a href="https://federate.social/@mattblaze" title="mattblaze@federate.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/20679-48-20230314144041.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Matt Blaze" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Matt Blaze</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>RE: <a href="https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman/117209346171417433" rel="nofollow">https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman/117209346171417433</a></p><p>Great (as usual) thread by <a href="https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman">@heidilifeldman</a> on the current status of the various cases challenging the administration's executive order on vote-by-mail.</p><p>Note that how / whether the exec order will affect mail voting in the midterms effectively rests entirely on procedural issues at this point. The merits haven't been addressed (or even fully briefed) yet, and won't be before November.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/6668153#notice-13123641">In conversation</a><time datetime="2026-09-04T07:29:11+09:00" title="Friday, 04-Sep-2026 07:29:11 JST">about a month ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://federate.social/@mattblaze/117209457750923147" rel="external" title="Sent from federate.social via ActivityPub">federate.social</a></span></span><a href="https://federate.social/@mattblaze/117209457750923147">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman/117209346171417433Great">Heidi Li Feldman (@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social)</a></h5><div> from <span>Heidi Li Feldman</span></div></header><div>Ok, take a deep breath everyone. I’m going to try to explain what is going on in California v. Trump/League of Women Voters v. Trump, the combined cases being heard by Judge Indira Talwani in the Massachusetts District Court, challenging Trump and USPS efforts to take over vote-from-home and disrupt the general election. 1/ #LawFedi</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Matt Blaze (mattblaze@federate.social)'s status on Friday, 04-Sep-2026 07:29:11 JSTMatt Blaze
- Heidi Li Feldman
RE: https://mastodon.social/@heidilifeldman/117209346171417433
Great (as usual) thread by @heidilifeldman on the current status of the various cases challenging the administration's executive order on vote-by-mail.
Note that how / whether the exec order will affect mail voting in the midterms effectively rests entirely on procedural issues at this point. The merits haven't been addressed (or even fully briefed) yet, and won't be before November.
In conversationabout a month ago from federate.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Heidi Li Feldman (@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social)
  from Heidi Li Feldman
  Ok, take a deep breath everyone. I’m going to try to explain what is going on in California v. Trump/League of Women Voters v. Trump, the combined cases being heard by Judge Indira Talwani in the Massachusetts District Court, challenging Trump and USPS efforts to take over vote-from-home and disrupt the general election. 1/ #LawFedi

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice