Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/nicklockwood/statuses/117069670583842298">Nick Lockwood (nicklockwood@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 10-Aug-2026 15:26:27 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@nicklockwood" title="nicklockwood@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/106437-48-20231123192923.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Nick Lockwood" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Nick Lockwood</a></section><article><p>RE: <a href="https://mastodon.social/@colincornaby/117069185435215102" rel="nofollow">https://mastodon.social/@colincornaby/117069185435215102</a></p><p>Holy shit, so the "Claude plagiarised an app" story is actually "Claude produced the same app twice when prompted to do so by two separate developers" 😅</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/6611313#notice-13014230">In conversation</a><time datetime="2026-08-10T15:26:27+09:00" title="Monday, 10-Aug-2026 15:26:27 JST">about 19 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@nicklockwood/117069670583842298" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@nicklockwood/117069670583842298">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://mastodon.social/@colincornaby/117069185435215102Holy">Colin Cornaby (@colincornaby@mastodon.social)</a></h5><div> from <span>Colin Cornaby</span></div></header><div>https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/117066183348062085I looked at the replies to this post, did some more digging, and found the actual story is *even weirder.*BOTH projects were generated using Claude. So you have two people - both generating the same app from the same training data - having a public throw down over who copied who. Kind of embarrassing.The one guy claiming his Claude generated code as an original creation no one else can "copy" is maybe the most embarrassing part.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Nick Lockwood (nicklockwood@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 10-Aug-2026 15:26:27 JST Nick Lockwood
RE: https://mastodon.social/@colincornaby/117069185435215102
Holy shit, so the "Claude plagiarised an app" story is actually "Claude produced the same app twice when prompted to do so by two separate developers" 😅
In conversationabout 19 days ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Colin Cornaby (@colincornaby@mastodon.social)
  from Colin Cornaby
  https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/117066183348062085 I looked at the replies to this post, did some more digging, and found the actual story is *even weirder.* BOTH projects were generated using Claude. So you have two people - both generating the same app from the same training data - having a public throw down over who copied who. Kind of embarrassing. The one guy claiming his Claude generated code as an original creation no one else can "copy" is maybe the most embarrassing part.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice