@bonifartius

> the heidegger argument. it would change me

I get it. personally I'm not opposed to changing. in the words of heraclitus, you can never step in the same river twice. but fwiw, I think citing heidegger is also a great argument that refusing to use AI is inherently fascist (libtard logic). 🤪

> is it really MY work if 90% is done by some automaton

you could make the same argument about whether it's your work because you used a plough and a combine to plant & harvest crops instead of digging the furrows with a stick and harvesting with a sharp rock. at the end of the day "MY work" is just a question of ego, whereas the products of the labour is what's really the point in the first place. and given that AI is trained on a large chunk of human knowledge, how is it different from planting an acre by yourself, vs planting that same acre with the help of your family or community? there's no case where we're not leveraging work done by others, whether directly or in the form of tools we didn't invent and manufacture from scratch, and thus we're always necessarily sharing the credit for the end result whether we acknowledge that explicitly or not.

that being said, I don't fault or judge you for your choice. just being the devil's advocate for the sake of argument.