@FiringSquadsEnjoyer you haven't been talking about incest, you've been talking about child molestation. but the majority of people see incest advocation as advocating for the ability of consenting adults to do whatever regardless of their genetic makeup, and rape is irrelevant to this because incest is not mutually inclusive with rape. you used the same argument against incest ("if an adult incests a kid that's bad"; yes it's bad because it's nonconsensual) that homophobes used against gay marriage ("if an adult homosexes a kid that's bad") and transphobes are using against trans people ("if an adult transes a kid that's bad"). your conflating these subjects was such an obvious fallacy that to leave it unaddressed would have enabled the other uses for it. in order for there to be a "victim" of incest there has to be an aggressor; in order for there to be an aggressor there has to be aggression; sexual violence happens with or without incest being involved. you are literally arguing against sex because rape exists

if you feel dogpiled turn off the computer or leave the thread. i'm not gonna cater to your lack of self control on the internet. it's bad enough i'm actually taking the time to write thoughtful replies now. it's worse that i had to edit this because you deleted the comment to which i was replying