Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://infosec.exchange/users/mnordhoff/statuses/116245626052287635">Matt Nordhoff (mnordhoff@infosec.exchange)'s status on Wednesday, 18-Mar-2026 03:54:28 JST</a><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@mnordhoff" title="mnordhoff@infosec.exchange"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="Matt Nordhoff" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Matt Nordhoff</a></section><article><p>A week ago, the US Fourth Circuit held that it violates the Fourth Amendment for feds to do a warrantless search of someone's Google Drive. Interesting!</p><p>Nonetheless they aren't throwing the evidence out.</p><p>It was about CSAM.</p><p><a href="https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/244546.P.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/244546.P.pdf</a></p><p>(via <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ssxnmhdtz6le6nxu7jfhglz6/post/3mhbg3yiowc2t" rel="nofollow">https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ssxnmhdtz6le6nxu7jfhglz6/post/3mhbg3yiowc2t</a>)</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/6244686#notice-12305887">In conversation</a><time datetime="2026-03-18T03:54:28+09:00" title="Wednesday, 18-Mar-2026 03:54:28 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@mnordhoff/116245626052287635" rel="external" title="Sent from infosec.exchange via ActivityPub">infosec.exchange</a></span></span><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@mnordhoff/116245626052287635">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/160459">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.bsky.app</div><h5><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ssxnmhdtz6le6nxu7jfhglz6/post/3mhbg3yiowc2t">Mrs. Detective Pikajew, Esq. (@clapifyoulikeme.favrd.social)</a></h5><div> from <span>Mrs. Detective Pikajew, Esq. (@clapifyoulikeme.favrd.social)</span></div></header><div>This is a great decision from a privacy standpoint. I hope more circuits adopt similar reasoning. https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/244546.P.pdf</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Matt Nordhoff (mnordhoff@infosec.exchange)'s status on Wednesday, 18-Mar-2026 03:54:28 JST Matt Nordhoff
A week ago, the US Fourth Circuit held that it violates the Fourth Amendment for feds to do a warrantless search of someone's Google Drive. Interesting!
Nonetheless they aren't throwing the evidence out.
It was about CSAM.
https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/244546.P.pdf
(via https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ssxnmhdtz6le6nxu7jfhglz6/post/3mhbg3yiowc2t)
In conversationabout 6 months ago from infosec.exchangepermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.bsky.app
  Mrs. Detective Pikajew, Esq. (@clapifyoulikeme.favrd.social)
  from Mrs. Detective Pikajew, Esq. (@clapifyoulikeme.favrd.social)
  This is a great decision from a privacy standpoint. I hope more circuits adopt similar reasoning. https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/244546.P.pdf

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice