GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice

  1. Embed this notice
    Miguel Arroz (arroz@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Feb-2026 23:18:10 JSTMiguel ArrozMiguel Arroz

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

    This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

    Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

    LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

    Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

    In conversationabout a month ago from mastodon.socialpermalink

    Attachments

    1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
      Steve Troughton-Smith (@stroughtonsmith@mastodon.social)
      from Steve Troughton-Smith
      Much as you don't generally go auditing the bytecode or intermediate representation generated by your compiler, I think the idea of manually reviewing LLM-written code will fall by the wayside too. Like it or not, these agents are the new compilers, and prompting them is the new programming. Regardless of what happens with any AI bubble, this is just how things will be from now on; we've experienced a permanent, irreversible increase to the level of abstraction. We are all assembly programmers
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.