Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this noticeSo US Invaded Venezuela and Captured Nicolás Maduro.
ChatGPT and the Perplexity search engine are here to help you understand why this is not only a bad thing, but absolutely did not happen.
https://archive.is/cCLO9
>"What's likely going on is a mix-up with real events that are often described in dramatic or misleading ways online. Here's what actually has happened:
>What the U.S. did not do:
❌ No U.S. military invasion of Venezuela
❌ No arrest or capture of Nicolás Maduro
❌ No overthrow of the Venezuelan government by U.S. forces
Maduro is still in power in Venezuela."
I have used Grok as an augmented search tool on occasion and it's often pretty good. When you don't know the exact name of what you are looking for it will match things up better than Google.
Sometimes it misses things or simply gets it wrong, but I haven't seen it get things this wrong. (Grok told me in answer to a poorly-worded question, "No, the US did not capture Nicolás Maduro today. It happened yesterday." which was true at least in my own time zone.)
>"Pure LLMs are inevitably stuck in the past, tied to when they are trained, and deeply limited in their inherent abilities to reason, search the web, 'think' critically, etc.," says Gary Marcus, a cognitive scientist and author of Taming Silicon Valley: How We Can Ensure That AI Works for Us. While human intervention can fix glaring problems like the Maduro response, Marcus says, that doesn't address the underlying problem. "The unreliability of LLMs in the face of novelty is one of the core reasons why businesses shouldn't trust LLMs."
This problem has been greatly alleviated by AI providers enabling live search, which loads fresh data into the context window the AI equivalent of short-term memory.
But it can't be properly fixed without continual learning, which is an unsolved problem with LLMs.