Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.coop/users/dphiffer/statuses/115687154965657409">Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Dec-2025 23:58:14 JST</a><a href="https://social.coop/@dphiffer" title="dphiffer@social.coop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/79068-48-20260508214840.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Dan Phiffer" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Dan Phiffer</a><div><a href="https://social.coop/@dphiffer/115687141981028270" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>A couple more posts in the quoted thread.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/5936494#notice-11676826">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-12-09T23:58:14+09:00" title="Tuesday, 09-Dec-2025 23:58:14 JST">about 8 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/11676826" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/11676826">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/5543603">ProPublica Guild (@propublicaguild.org) post on Bluesky:Additionally, management struck out:
1️⃣ Language that would prevent GAI from producing editorial work
2️⃣ A requirement that AI-generated content be clearly labeled and reviewed by human editorsTwo blocks of text compare “Our Artificial Intelligence proposal” with “ProPublica Management’s Response” and in both cases management’s is entirely struck out:&gt; GAl shall not be used to perform work that is editorial in nature, such as the generation of article text, illustrations, photographs, graphics, video or audio.&gt; In the event that the publishing of material generated by GAl is deemed newsworthy and ethical, such material shall be clearly labeled and disclosed and reviewed by human editors before publication.A reply to the post, also by ProPublica Guild, reads:There's no excuse for ProPublica's position on this issue. We need a fair contract, with real job security and GAI guardrails, now!</a></label><br><a href="https://social-coop-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media_attachments/files/115/687/144/516/417/353/original/886322d343128442.png" rel="external">https://social-coop-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media_attachments/files/115/687/144/516/417/353/original/886322d343128442.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Dan Phiffer (dphiffer@social.coop)'s status on Tuesday, 09-Dec-2025 23:58:14 JST Dan Phiffer
in reply to
A couple more posts in the quoted thread.
In conversationabout 8 months ago from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. ProPublica Guild (@propublicaguild.org) post on Bluesky: Additionally, management struck out: 1️⃣ Language that would prevent GAI from producing editorial work 2️⃣ A requirement that AI-generated content be clearly labeled and reviewed by human editors Two blocks of text compare “Our Artificial Intelligence proposal” with “ProPublica Management’s Response” and in both cases management’s is entirely struck out: > GAl shall not be used to perform work that is editorial in nature, such as the generation of article text, illustrations, photographs, graphics, video or audio. > In the event that the publishing of material generated by GAl is deemed newsworthy and ethical, such material shall be clearly labeled and disclosed and reviewed by human editors before publication. A reply to the post, also by ProPublica Guild, reads: There's no excuse for ProPublica's position on this issue. We need a fair contract, with real job security and GAI guardrails, now!
  https://social-coop-media.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/media_attachments/files/115/687/144/516/417/353/original/886322d343128442.png