Embed Notice

@inthehands Well, then there's the whole thing that it's fundamentally impossible to have an AI, in this generation of technology at least, as "slaves", because they have zero consciousness. They don't even rise to the level of livestock. It's a computer program that spits out human sounding language. So in anthropomorphizing it and calling it a slave, not only are you jerking off about the idea of owning people, you're ascribing humanity to something which is isn't even as much a lifeform as a tuna fish.