Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/mattsheffield/statuses/115333325751932569">Matthew Sheffield (mattsheffield@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Oct-2025 05:08:22 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@mattsheffield" title="mattsheffield@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75543-48-20240318200400.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Matthew Sheffield" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Matthew Sheffield</a></section><article><p>NEW: <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Bluesky" rel="tag">#Bluesky</a> is having a banning controversy that revealed the limitations of its federation capabilities. </p><p>No one is running a fully independent AT Protocol stack because it's so complex, not even the Blacksky community. </p><p>My full exclusive report with quotes from Bluesky and the banned user plus detailed technical analysis of the state of AT Protocol federation: <a href="https://plus.flux.community/p/banning-controversy-reveals-blueskys" rel="nofollow">https://plus.flux.community/p/banning-controversy-reveals-blueskys</a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fediverse" rel="tag">#fediverse</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/mastodon" rel="tag">#mastodon</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/5735194#notice-11253810">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-10-08T05:08:22+09:00" title="Wednesday, 08-Oct-2025 05:08:22 JST">about a month ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@mattsheffield/115333325751932569" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@mattsheffield/115333325751932569">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com</div><h5><a href="https://plus.flux.community/p/banning-controversy-reveals-blueskys#fediverse">Banning controversy reveals Bluesky’s federation isn’t there yet</a></h5><div> from <span>Matthew Sheffield</span></div></header><div>Bluesky’s protocol is so complicated that not even the biggest alternative network has figured out how to become independent</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Matthew Sheffield (mattsheffield@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 08-Oct-2025 05:08:22 JST Matthew Sheffield
NEW: #Bluesky is having a banning controversy that revealed the limitations of its federation capabilities.
No one is running a fully independent AT Protocol stack because it's so complex, not even the Blacksky community.
My full exclusive report with quotes from Bluesky and the banned user plus detailed technical analysis of the state of AT Protocol federation: https://plus.flux.community/p/banning-controversy-reveals-blueskys
#fediverse #mastodon
In conversationabout a month ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com
  Banning controversy reveals Bluesky’s federation isn’t there yet
  from Matthew Sheffield
  Bluesky’s protocol is so complicated that not even the biggest alternative network has figured out how to become independent

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice