Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://techpolicy.social/users/ericgoldman/statuses/115274720026230726">Eric Goldman (ericgoldman@techpolicy.social)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 22:38:26 JST</a><a href="https://techpolicy.social/@ericgoldman" title="ericgoldman@techpolicy.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/315649-48-20250115153907.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Eric Goldman" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Eric Goldman</a></section><article><p>"if the concern had been that TikTok could be a conduit for Chinese government propaganda—a concern the Supreme Court declined to even consider—people can now be concerned that TikTok could be a conduit for U.S. government propaganda"</p><p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-statement-tiktok-ownership-deal" rel="nofollow">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-statement-tiktok-ownership-deal</a></p><p>📉</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/5691227#notice-11170349">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-09-27T22:38:26+09:00" title="Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 22:38:26 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://techpolicy.social/@ericgoldman/115274720026230726" rel="external" title="Sent from techpolicy.social via ActivityPub">techpolicy.social</a></span></span><a href="https://techpolicy.social/@ericgoldman/115274720026230726">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.eff.org</div><h5><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-statement-tiktok-ownership-deal">EFF Statement on TikTok Ownership Deal</a></h5><div> from <span>David Greene and Eva Galperin</span></div></header><div>One of the reasons we opposed the TikTok "ban" is that the First Amendment is supposed to protect us against government using its power to manipulate speech. But as predicted, the TikTok "ban" has only resulted in turning over the platform to the allies of a President who seems to have no respect for the First Amendment.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Eric Goldman (ericgoldman@techpolicy.social)'s status on Saturday, 27-Sep-2025 22:38:26 JST Eric Goldman
"if the concern had been that TikTok could be a conduit for Chinese government propaganda—a concern the Supreme Court declined to even consider—people can now be concerned that TikTok could be a conduit for U.S. government propaganda"
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-statement-tiktok-ownership-deal
📉
In conversationabout 6 months ago from techpolicy.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.eff.org
  EFF Statement on TikTok Ownership Deal
  from David Greene and Eva Galperin
  One of the reasons we opposed the TikTok "ban" is that the First Amendment is supposed to protect us against government using its power to manipulate speech. But as predicted, the TikTok "ban" has only resulted in turning over the platform to the allies of a President who seems to have no respect for the First Amendment.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice